<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>The Safer Sex Page</title>
        <link>http://safersex.org/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:14:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>USATODAY.com</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/retail/2009-02-11-cash-strapped-condoms_N.htm">Recession seems to put people in the mood for condoms.</a>]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2009/02/usatodaycom.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2009/02/usatodaycom.shtml</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Condoms</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:14:04 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Female Condoms Redesigned</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div style="padding:1px;border:#cccccc dotted 1px;"><div style="background:#dac7e0;padding:15px;">Only about 12 million female condoms are delivered each year in poor countries, compared with about 6 billion male condoms. Couples complained that the female version was awkward, unsightly, noisy and slippery — or, as Mitchell Warren, who was one of its earliest champions, now says, ‘the yuck factor was a problem.’ Many women tried it, but in the end, it was adopted mainly by prostitutes.

Now scientists are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/13/health/13cond.html?_r=2&ref=science&oref=slogin&oref=slogin">trying again</a>. A new design — much the same at one end, different at the other — has been developed, and its makers hope it will succeed where its predecessor failed.</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/11/female-condoms-redesigned.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/11/female-condoms-redesigned.shtml</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Condoms</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:32:53 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Nitrosamine &amp; Condoms</title>
            <description><![CDATA[In recent years reader's have asked about nitrosamine.  In 2004 a German study raised some concern about nitrosamine in the latex used for condom manufacture.

<div style="padding:1px;border:#cccccc dotted 1px;margin-bottom:5px;"><div style="background:#dac7e0;padding:15px;"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=15672455">Furthermore</a>, 32 rubber condom samples collected in 2004 from the German market were surveyed for nitrosamines by determining the amount migrating into an artificial sweat test solution. The levels released from condoms varied from < 10 to 660 mug per kg material (i. e., up to 1.4 mug nitrosamines per condom). In a model calculation, not considering the differences that may exist in the resorption rate, we have calculated that the exposure from condoms may exceed the exposure from food 1.5-3 fold.</div></div>

While nitrosamines can be found in a large variety of foods (mainly fried foods) it is not known exactly how they may be involved in cancer.  Studies have suggested that increased amounts of nitrosamine in fried foods may be an indicator for stomach cancer.  There is no legal regime that I am aware of which regulates nitrosamine.  Studies are ongoing concerning risks involved in nitrosamines.  

This may not be much help to you if you have been privy to gossip that somehow condoms can cause cancer.  Suffice it to say that from my perspective, admittedly non-scientific, there are questions to be answered about nitrosamine and considering that noone (I hope) eats and digests condoms it is safe to say that getting stomach cancer from using condoms is not a danger.  I look forward to the results of further studies but can say with complete confidence I continue to use condoms on a regular basis with no concern at all that I will get cancer from that use.]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/11/nitrosamine.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/11/nitrosamine.shtml</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:48:02 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>WtF</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
.flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; }
.flickr-yourcomment { }
.flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; }
.flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; }
</style>

<div class="flickr-frame">
	<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimwich/1491466752/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1061/1491466752_93f0af46ff.jpg" class="flickr-photo" alt="" /></a>
<br />
	<span class="flickr-caption"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimwich/1491466752/">WtF Magazine (Welcome to Finland)</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/jimwich/">JIMWICh</a>.</span>
</div>
				
<p class="flickr-yourcomment">
	Very cute!
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/10/wtf.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/10/wtf.shtml</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:18:34 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Current Projects</title>
            <description>I am currently seeking information on latex free diaphragms &amp; sodium bisulfite allergies as a result of using latex condoms.  If you have anything to share please let me know.  TIA</description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/10/current-projects.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/10/current-projects.shtml</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">SaferSex</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:39:50 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Rex &amp; Mimi</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RBlYxfuxUyE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RBlYxfuxUyE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

This person's [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/jenjempa94">jenjempa94</a>] obsession with Rex and Mimi reminds me of Miranda's obsession with <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,1013594,00.html">Jules & Mimi</a>.]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/10/rex-mimi.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/10/rex-mimi.shtml</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Silly Stuff</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:18:10 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Get Me Some Naked Angelina Jolie!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=485448&in_page_id=1965">This</a> really isn't much of a surprise.  I've destroyed at least 5 computers hoping to catch a glimpse of that hotty.]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/10/get-me-some-naked-angelina-jol.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/10/get-me-some-naked-angelina-jol.shtml</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Web/Tech</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Underwear!!!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><a href="http://safersex.org/i/200708300857.shtml" onclick="window.open('http://safersex.org/i/200708300857.shtml','popup','width=500,height=683,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://safersex.org/i/200708300857-thumb-500x683.jpg" alt="200708300857.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="683" width="500" /></a></span> <div><br /></div>

Vintage underwear <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/vintage_ads/422305.html">advert</a> from Munsingwear shows a bit of homoeroticism from my papa's days. "Let's get down to business!"

<em><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/08/30/homoerotic-underwear.html">via</a></em> ]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/08/underwear.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/08/underwear.shtml</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">homoerotic</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:29:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Orgasms!!!!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Here's a fine young thing trying to speak:

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-3JOdQc__Mo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-3JOdQc__Mo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Here's the ad in which he apparently failed to make the cut:

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IHoXc6zCoRs"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IHoXc6zCoRs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/08/orgasms.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/08/orgasms.shtml</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Silly Stuff</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:12:20 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Tim Browse Philosophy</title>
            <description><![CDATA["<a href="http://tdv.com/html/tim_b.html">Cynicism is the condom of the romantic</a>."]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/08/tim-browse-philosophy.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/08/tim-browse-philosophy.shtml</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Condoms</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:55:27 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Serial Numbers?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=23763">This</a> is very cute: "Well, you guys are not rolling it back far enough to read it."  Old joke to be sure, but a good one nevertheless.]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/08/serial-numbers.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/08/serial-numbers.shtml</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Silly Stuff</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:47:32 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Condomistic Intercourse</title>
            <description><![CDATA[This term "<a href="http://reform-catholic.blogspot.com/2007/08/double-effect-permits-condoms-in.html">condomistic intercourse</a>" is a new one.  Reform Catholic has an interesting take on condoms within Catholic doctrine.

<div style="padding:1px;border:#cccccc dotted 1px;"><div style="background:#dac7e0;padding:15px;">That being said, we Romans don't have much of a logical leg to stand on by saying condoms are always evil. They are usually a side affect of the sex act. Advertising condoms might be very evil if they are made out to be a ticket to consequence free sexual fun! But the condoms themselves are not in themselves evil, nor is the use of them. The sex act itself can be evil, if misdirected or not open to accidental life.</div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/08/condomistic-intercourse.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/08/condomistic-intercourse.shtml</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Condoms</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:42:30 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Opus Agonistes</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Because I love a good controversy and because even more importantly I looooooooove Berkeley Breathed it is important to note how stupid this <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/media/2007/08/26/opus/index.html">controversy</a> is.  

Okay it's been <a href="http://www.salon.com/comics/opus/2007/08/26/opus/">noted</a>.  

Me thinks it's the rampant nudity.  Just last week when Mr. Breathed poked his cute little head into the office and asked I told him point blank not to reference the nudists.  They get so bent out of shape so easily.

<a href="http://www.salon.com/comics/opus/2007/08/26/opus/"><img src="http://safersex.org/i/20070826_opus.jpg" border="0" height="218" width="299" alt="20070826_opus.jpg" align="" /></a>]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/08/opus-reviled.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/08/opus-reviled.shtml</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:19:10 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Lisa Howard Was A Dancing Condom</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
.flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; }
.flickr-yourcomment { }
.flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; }
.flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; }
</style>

<div class="flickr-frame">
	<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lisasweeney/4693333/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/4/4693333_9abaaa4fe4.jpg" class="flickr-photo" alt="" /></a>
<br />
	<span class="flickr-caption"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lisasweeney/4693333/">dancing condom</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/lisasweeney/">Lisa.Howard</a>.</span>
</div>
				
<p class="flickr-yourcomment">
	
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/08/lisa-howard-was-a-dancing-cond.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/08/lisa-howard-was-a-dancing-cond.shtml</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:55:40 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bored Drag</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
.flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; }
.flickr-yourcomment { }
.flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; }
.flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; }
</style>

<div class="flickr-frame">
	<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lukewho/203586925/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/78/203586925_b51164fe6e.jpg" class="flickr-photo" alt="" /></a>
<br />
	<span class="flickr-caption"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lukewho/203586925/">shut the dore, eat a condom</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/lukewho/">lukewho</a>.</span>
</div>
				
<p class="flickr-yourcomment">
	I can't tell if this is supposed to be ad for condoms or for cellphones.
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://safersex.org/2007/08/bored-drag.shtml</link>
            <guid>http://safersex.org/2007/08/bored-drag.shtml</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:53:18 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
